Fifth Circuit· 11/9/2023
VanDerStok v. Garland
Citations
- 86 F.4th 179
Oral arguments
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is axiomatic that an administrative agency’s power to promulgate legislative regulations is limited to the authority delegated by Congress.”
- “It is axiomatic that an administrative agency’s power to promulgate legislative regulations is limited to the authority delegated by Congress.” (quoting Bowen v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 488 U.S. 204, 208, 109 S.Ct. 468, 102 L.Ed.2d 493 (1988)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 5,137×
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,963×
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 1,641×
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,491×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court· 2020-06-15· cited 1,289×
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,222×
- National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court· 2012-06-28· cited 1,025×
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court· 2018-04-17· cited 942×
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court· 2015-06-25· cited 932×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 916×
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court· 1963-04-01· cited 902×
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 890×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.