Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/5/1971

Rewis v. United States

Citations

  • 401 U.S. 808
  • 91 S. Ct. 1056
  • 28 L. Ed. 2d 493
  • 1971 U.S. LEXIS 60
  • 27 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “ambiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity”
  • holding that ambiguity in criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity
  • observing that “ambiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity”
  • emphasizing that “ambiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity”
  • explaining that the rule of lenity dictates that “ambiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity [to the defendant].”
  • explaining that the rule of lenity dictates that \ambiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity [to the defendant].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

492 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rewis v. United States

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.