Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a due process claim may involve “the act of hiring or the continuing employment relationship with the government”
• clarifying a panel is “not precluded from supplementing the contentions of counsel through [its] own deliberation[s] and research” (emphasis added)
• “The premise of our adversarial system is that appellate courts do not sit as self-directed boards of legal inquiry and research, but essentially as arbiters of legal questions presented and argued by the parties before them.”
• “The premise of our adversarial system is that appellate courts do not sit as self-directed boards of legal inquiry and research, but essentially as arbiters of legal questions presented and argued by the parties before them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).