· 3/9/2015
Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.
Citations
- 575 U.S. 92
- 135 S. Ct. 1199
- 191 L. Ed. 2d 186
- 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1740
- 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 127
- 83 U.S.L.W. 4160
- 45 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20050
- 24 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that interpretive rules often do not go through the typical notice-and-comment process
- “Interpretive rules ‘do not have the force and effect of law . . . .’” (quoting Shalala v. Guernsey Mem. Hosp., 514 U.S. 87, 99 (1995))
- “Not all ‘rules’ must be issued through the notice-and-comment process. Section 4(b)(A
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: SOTOMAYORdelivered
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.