Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \intentional infliction of emotional distress is an injury to the person\; Billmeyer v. Plaza Bank of Commerce, 42 Cal.App.4th 1086, 50 Cal.Rptr.2d 119, 125 (1995
• holding that \intentional infliction of emotional distress is an injury to the person\
• affirming demurrer to claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress because threat of or attempt to resort to legal process cannot give rise to cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress
• cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress accrues when plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress due to outrageous conduct of defendant
• “Because intentional infliction of emotional distress is an injury to the per son, the applicable statute of limitations is one year.”
• innocence is based upon the opinion of the party who dismisses a lawsuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).