Bogard v. Employers Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing insureds’ negligent infliction of emotional distress claim against insurer
• setting forth elements of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim
• “there could be no conflict of interest until such time as there was a claim against the insureds over [the policy limits].”
• “The attorney hired by the insurance company to defend in an action against the insured owes fiduciary duties to two clients: the insurer and the insured.” (citations omitted)
• “By alleging that [the insurer] did not properly investigate the claims ..., [the insureds] have only alleged a breach of the duty to defend.” (emphasis added)
• California case where was party given leave to amend for a negligent infliction of emotional distress claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).