Das v. Bank of America, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that assister liability for elder 16 abuse uses the same knowledge standard as common law aiding and abetting, and both require a 17 showing that the defendant had “actual knowledge” of the underlying crime/tort
• holding §15630.1(g) barred negligence per se claim based on duty to 2g || report
• affirming dismissal of an aiding and abetting claim because plaintiff failed to allege that “the bank had actual knowledge of the underlying wrong it purportedly aided and abetted”
• undue influence requires one party to “t[ake] some advantage of the mental weakness or incapacity of the other party”
• undue influence requires one party to “t[ake] some advantage of the mental weakness or incapacity of the other party”
• no mention of section 15610.07 in discussion of pleading requirements under 15610.30

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).