Skip to main content
· 6/27/2007

Contemporary Services Corp. v. Staff Pro Inc.

Citations

  • 61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 434
  • 152 Cal. App. 4th 1043
  • 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In order to prove intentional or negligent interference 8 with prospective economic advantage, plaintiffs must show defendants engaged in conduct that 9 was wrongful by some legal measure other than the fact of the interference itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fybel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.