Skip to main content

People v. Taylor

Citations

  • 782 N.E.2d 920
  • 335 Ill. App. 3d 965
  • 270 Ill. Dec. 361
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 1269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, “the psychological or psychiatric testimony of an expert predicated upon actuarial instruments is scientific evidence”
  • holding that such actuarial instruments constitute a scientific methodology
  • holding that such actuarial instruments constitute a scientific methodology
  • holding that such actuarial instruments constitute a scientific methodology
  • in which the Second District recently held that certain actuarial instruments did not satisfy the Frye standard
  • in which the Second District recently held that certain actuarial instruments did not satisfy the Frye standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutchinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.