District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/29/2000
Westerheide v. State
Citations
- 767 So. 2d 637
- 2000 WL 1434081
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the Act passes muster under either the \rational basis\ or the \strict scrutiny\ test
- holding that the Jimmy Ryce Act is civil in nature and that confinement is for treatment and the protection of the public, not punishment
- holding that the Jimmy Ryce Act is civil in nature and that confinement is for treatment and the protection of the public, not punishment
- upholding constitutionality of the Act, citing Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 117 S.Ct. 2072, 138 L.Ed.2d 501 (1997)
- “The admission of expert testimony from psychologists and psychiatrists for the purpose of predicting future dangerousness caused by mental illness or abnormalities is nothing new or novel to the law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sawaya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. Superior Court (Ghilotti)California Supreme Court· 2002-04-25· cited 215×
- Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 152×
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 109×
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. DenglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-30· cited 96×
- Beasley v. MolettTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2002-12-19· cited 92×
- Barbour v. Brinker Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-12· cited 58×
- In Re Commitment of RSNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-04-20· cited 49×
- In Re Leon G.Arizona Supreme Court· 2002-12-16· cited 43×
- Grosinger v. M.B.K.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-02-20· cited 33×
- In re the Detention of KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-23· cited 30×
- In Re Detention of KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-23· cited 27×
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 24×
- Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-02· cited 23×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 22×
- In Re Leon G.Arizona Supreme Court· 2001-07-12· cited 22×
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-09-08· cited 19×
- In re Detention of NewAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-06-12· cited 19×
- In re the Commitment of W.Z.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-04-23· cited 19×
- H & H ELEC., INC. v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-10· cited 17×
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-30· cited 14×
Cites
81 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,199×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 1,231×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- United States v. WardSupreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 969×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 741×
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 550×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.