Detention of Henrickson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he Washington sexually violent predator statute is premised on a finding of the present dangerousness of those subject to commitment.”
• “The Washington sexually violent predator statute is premised on a finding of the present dangerousness of those subject to commitment.”
• \The Washington sexually violent predator statute is premised on a finding of the present dangerousness of those subject to commitment.\
• appellate court reviewed offenders' histories and nature of charges leading to incarceration to determine whether convictions would qualify as recent overt acts.
• \The Washington sexually violent predator statute is premised on a finding of the present dangerousness of those subject to commitment.\
• Henrickson’s convictions “would certainly qualify as ... a recent overt act” and Halgren’s conviction “would also qualify as a. . . recent overt act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).