Indiana Court of Appeals· 2/29/2000
Overstreet v. State
Citations
- 724 N.E.2d 661
- 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 210
- 2000 WL 225933
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an interaction between an officer and the defendant was a consensual encounter and thus the officer was not required to possess reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing to approach the defendant
- holding that the Fourth Amendment was not implicated when the officer followed the defendant to a gas station, approached him, asked about his action, and asked for his identification
- holding that an interaction between an officer and the defendant was a consensual encounter and thus the officer was not required to possess reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing to approach the defendant
- holding that defendant was not stopped or seized where officer pulled his patrol car behind defendant’s car at fuel pump without activating his lights, approached him, asked for identification, and questioned him about suspicious activity
- concluding that no stop or seizure occurred where officer stopped at a gas station without activating lights or siren, approached Overstreet while he was putting air in his tires, asked him for identification, and questioned him about what he had been doing
- stating unlike typical sufficiency of the evidence case where only the evidence favorable to the judgment is considered, we must also consider the uncontested evidence favorable to the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Najam, Brook, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kevin M. Clark v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-09-17· cited 276×
- Crabtree v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-02-08· cited 51×
- Edmond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-07-14· cited 47×
- Ransom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 39×
- Bovie v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-01-17· cited 39×
- Morales v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-06-08· cited 38×
- Cochran v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-03-17· cited 34×
- Wales v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-05-28· cited 31×
- Woodson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-29· cited 31×
- Hayes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 28×
- Powell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-09-08· cited 27×
- Bentley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-04-27· cited 25×
- State v. AugustineIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-01· cited 23×
- Manigault v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-02-22· cited 22×
- Cudworth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-24· cited 22×
- Sebastian v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-10· cited 22×
- State v. CalmesIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-09-18· cited 20×
- Scott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-11-03· cited 19×
- Ashley Bell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-07-28· cited 19×
- State v. CarlsonIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-01-18· cited 18×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
- Florida v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1984-11-13· cited 466×
- Fair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 121×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-03· cited 98×
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-11-28· cited 73×
- Webb v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-08-17· cited 31×
- Stalling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-07-13· cited 30×
- Molino v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-12-05· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.