Skip to main content

State v. Eckel

Citations

  • 863 A.2d 1044
  • 374 N.J. Super. 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We conclude that unless and until our Supreme Court definitively decides otherwise, Belton does not represent the law in New Jersey under the greater protections provided by our State Constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Cuff, Weissbard and Hoens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.