McMorran v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that \[a] search pursuant to consent is constitutionally permissible\ only when the party consents voluntarily
• stating this court “reviews the lawfulness of a search de novo because such a review requires consideration of both factual circumstances and legal issues”
• “If the contract’s written words have two or more reasonable meanings (i.e., are ‘ambiguous’) when read in context, a court may not grant summary judgment or direct a verdict; instead, it must put the case to a trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).