· 6/25/2009
St. James Village, Inc. v. Cunningham
Citations
- 210 P.3d 190
- 125 Nev. 211
- 125 Nev. Adv. Rep. 21
- 2009 Nev. LEXIS 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court's statement is dictum when \it is unnecessary to a determination of the questions involved\
- affirming the district court’s decision, although the court “relied on different grounds in reaching its decision”
- affirming the district court’s decision, although the court “relied on different grounds in reaching its decision”
- adopting section 4.8 of the Restatement (Third) of Property: Servitudes and holding the public policy interests advanced by adopting the rule outweighed the potential of any increased litigation associated with its adoption
- “[W]e adopt the rule set forth in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Physical and Emotional Harm section 51.”
- “[W]e adopt the rule set forth in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Physical and Emotional Harm, section 51.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardesty, Parraguirre, Douglas, Cherry, Saitta, Gibbons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.