Skip to main content
· 6/25/2009

St. James Village, Inc. v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 210 P.3d 190
  • 125 Nev. 211
  • 125 Nev. Adv. Rep. 21
  • 2009 Nev. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court's statement is dictum when \it is unnecessary to a determination of the questions involved\
  • affirming the district court’s decision, although the court “relied on different grounds in reaching its decision”
  • affirming the district court’s decision, although the court “relied on different grounds in reaching its decision”
  • adopting section 4.8 of the Restatement (Third) of Property: Servitudes and holding the public policy interests advanced by adopting the rule outweighed the potential of any increased litigation associated with its adoption
  • “[W]e adopt the rule set forth in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Physical and Emotional Harm section 51.”
  • “[W]e adopt the rule set forth in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Physical and Emotional Harm, section 51.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Parraguirre, Douglas, Cherry, Saitta, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.