Skip to main content

Cabral v. State

Citations

  • 277 P.3d 269
  • 127 Haw. 175
  • 2012 WL 1949330
  • 2012 Haw. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the “unique circumstances” doctrine where “[p]etitioners' request for an extension of time was filed prior to the expiration of the original deadline.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.