Skip to main content

Hall v. Hall

Citations

  • 22 P.3d 965
  • 95 Haw. 318
  • 2001 Haw. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court abused its discretion M grantmg motion to extend time to file notice of appeal based on attorney’s failure to read and comply with plarn language of applicable procedural rules
  • “we ruled in Enos that, as a matter of law, ‘only plausible misconstruction, but not mere ignorance, of the law or rules rises to the level of excusable neglect.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.