Skip to main content
· 11/18/1986

Bacon v. Karlin

Citations

  • 727 P.2d 1127
  • 68 Haw. 648
  • 1986 Haw. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the failure to file a notice of appeal within the time provided in HRAP Rule 4(a)(1) deprived . this court of appellate jurisdiction.
  • holding that the failure to file a notice of appeal within the time provided in HRAP Rule 4(a)(1) deprived this court of appellate jurisdiction.
  • providing that an appellate court must ensure that it has jurisdiction to hear and determine each case
  • stating that \an appellant's failure to file a timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional defect that can neither be waived by the parties nor disregarded by the court in the exercise of judicial discretion\
  • stating that “an appellant’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional defect that can neither be waived by the parties nor disregarded by the court in the exercise of judicial discretion”
  • failure to file a timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional defect that can neither be waived by the parties nor disregarded by the court in the exercise of judicial discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Intermediate, Tanaka, Place, Wakatsuki, Excused

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.