Rodime Plc v. Seagate Technology, Inc., Defendant-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that meetings at which defendant persuaded potential licensees to end license negotiations with the plaintiff \had nothing to do with petitioning the government.\
• holding that state-law claims of unfair competition are not preempted
• holding “positioning means” was not subject to § 112, ¶ 6 where the claim recited a detailed list of structural elements
• explaining that a party’s concession “does not relieve this court of its responsibility to interpret the claims as a matter of law”
• drawing a distinction between a hard disk and a hard disk drive
• allegation that defendant’s website states: “[w]e don’t allow replicas, counterfeit items, or unauthorized copies to be listed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).