DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reporter stated a claim for defamation based on statements made on television industry website
• holding that “a repudiation can be determined to have occurred only when” it is positive and unequivocal
• holding that “a repudiation can be determined to have occurred only when” it is positive and unequivocal (citations omitted)
• explaining that, even where a document is “integral” there must be “no material disputed issues of fact regarding the relevance of the document”
• noting that courts may only consider documents extraneous to the complaint if there is no dispute about the document’s accuracy
• explaining that, on a motion to dismiss, courts may consider documents incorporated by reference and documents integral to a complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).