Skip to main content
· 2/21/2012

Destinni Mardesich v. Matthew Cate

Citations

  • 668 F.3d 1164
  • 2012 WL 540072
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 3362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, the applicable trigger date under § 2244(d)(1) for cases involving an administrative decision is derived from subsection (D)
  • addressing timeliness issue in context of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), which is 13 similar to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)
  • “Therefore, we hold that AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations in § 2244(d)(1) applies to each claim in a habeas application on an individual basis.”
  • “Therefore, we hold that AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations in § 2244(d)(1) applies to each claim in a habeas application on an individual basis.”
  • “Therefore, we hold that AEDPA's one-year statute of limitations in § 22 2244(d)(1) applies to each claim in a habeas application on an individual basis.”
  • “Therefore, we hold that AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations in § 2244(d)(1) applies to each claim in a habeas application on an individual basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Gould, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.