Skip to main content
· 4/5/2012

Rashad v. Lafler

Citations

  • 675 F.3d 564
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6765
  • 2012 WL 1130446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, because the petitioner had ample opportunities to present his claim in state court, he was precluded from obtaining habeas relief on the claim
  • providing that to be a cognizable habeas claim, an erroneous jury instruction must deprive the defendant of due process
  • stating that, because the petitioner had ample opportunities to present his claim in state court, he was precluded from obtaining habeas relief
  • stating that, because the petitioner had ample opportunities to present his claim in state court, he was precluded from obtaining habeas relief on the claim
  • stating that, because the petitioner had ample opportunities to present his Fourth Amendment claims in state court, he was precluded from obtaining habeas relief on the claims
  • finding that the trial court’s rejection of Fourth Amendment claims “because [petitioner’s] attorney did not show up at the hearing designed to consider them” still provided Petitioner with “ample” opportunity to present his claims in state court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Sutton, Donald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.