Sixth Circuit· 4/5/2012
Rashad v. Lafler
Citations
- 675 F.3d 564
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6765
- 2012 WL 1130446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, because the petitioner had ample opportunities to present his claim in state court, he was precluded from obtaining habeas relief on the claim
- providing that to be a cognizable habeas claim, an erroneous jury instruction must deprive the defendant of due process
- stating that, because the petitioner had ample opportunities to present his claim in state court, he was precluded from obtaining habeas relief
- stating that, because the petitioner had ample opportunities to present his claim in state court, he was precluded from obtaining habeas relief on the claim
- stating that, because the petitioner had ample opportunities to present his Fourth Amendment claims in state court, he was precluded from obtaining habeas relief on the claims
- finding that the trial court’s rejection of Fourth Amendment claims “because [petitioner’s] attorney did not show up at the hearing designed to consider them” still provided Petitioner with “ample” opportunity to present his claims in state court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Sutton, Donald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Douglas Coley v. Margaret BagleySixth Circuit· 2013-02-08· cited 267×
- Michael Stansell v.Sixth Circuit· 2016-07-01· cited 138×
- DeLawrence King v. Donald MorganSixth Circuit· 2015-12-01· cited 120×
- Corey Woodfolk v. Gary MaynardFourth Circuit· 2017-05-23· cited 60×
- Fermin v. United StatesS.D. New York· 2012-05-04· cited 13×
- Fahie v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2015-05-18· cited 10×
- Redmond v. WorthintonE.D. Michigan· 2012-07-17· cited 9×
- State of Maine v. Calixte FleurySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2025-02-20· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court· 1991-12-04· cited 8,719×
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 4,521×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 3,877×
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,629×
- Burton v. StewartSupreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 1,506×
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1970-06-29· cited 985×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-05-15· cited 941×
- Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court· 2009-01-13· cited 910×
- People v. MendozaMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-06-20· cited 286×
- People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court· 1992-06-16· cited 252×
- Thomas L. Ludwig v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1998-12-21· cited 133×
- Parrish Searcy v. Harold Carter, WardenSixth Circuit· 2001-04-05· cited 130×
- Ferreira v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2007-08-07· cited 126×
- John Doe, Xiv v. Michigan Department of State Police and Col. Tadarial Sturdivant, Director, Michigan State PoliceSixth Circuit· 2007-07-18· cited 122×
- People v. TorresMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-06-06· cited 51×
- Ronald Dale Bachman v. Margaret Bagley, WardenSixth Circuit· 2007-05-18· cited 37×
- People v. MannMichigan Supreme Court· 1975-12-18· cited 33×
- People v. LeightyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-07-20· cited 20×
- Scott v. HubertFifth Circuit· 2011-03-09· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.