Skip to main content

Burnap v. Linnartz

Citations

  • 914 S.W.2d 142
  • 1995 WL 790002

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that fact question existed regarding whether attorney-client relationship was formed or whether attorney was acting as mere scrivener in a particular transaction
  • discussing how limitations period is tolled until plaintiff discovers or should have discovered nature of his injury
  • discussing how limitations period is tolled until plaintiff discovers or should have discovered nature of his injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapa, Stone, Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Burnap v. Linnartz

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.