Eakin v. Acosta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Thus, the mere fact that [defendant] is or was licensed in a Texas federal court does not establish the ‘continuous and systematic contacts’ needed to support general jurisdiction.”
• no personal jurisdiction in Texas over attorney performing legal work for Texas resident
• no personal jurisdiction in Texas over attorney performing legal work for Texas resident
• noting all legal work actually performed in Florida, not Texas
• noting all legal work actually performed in Florida, not Texas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).