Texas Supreme Court· 4/18/1984
Montgomery v. Kennedy
Citations
- 669 S.W.2d 309
- 27 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 332
- 1984 Tex. LEXIS 336
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating bills of review are scrutinized \with extreme jealousy and the grounds on which interference [with a final judgment] will be allowed are narrow and restricted\
- “It is particularly well-established that the alleged perjury of a witness on a contested issue, which the opposing party had the opportunity to refute, is intrinsic fraud.”
- “According finality to judgments is of fundamental importance.”
- detailing a fiduciary's duty of full disclosure
- detailing a fiduciary’s duty of full disclosure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson, Ray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
821 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-05-01· cited 7,748×
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court· 1997-10-02· cited 1,558×
- Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 997×
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court· 1994-06-15· cited 928×
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court· 1987-06-03· cited 844×
- Peter C. Browning v. Jeff P. ProstokTexas Supreme Court· 2005-05-27· cited 626×
- Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court· 1991-09-11· cited 610×
- Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 538×
- Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 467×
- Black v. Victoria Lloyds Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1990-11-14· cited 331×
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court· 1995-07-21· cited 290×
- Lesikar v. RappeportTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-12-06· cited 247×
- Vickery v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court· 1999-05-27· cited 166×
- Duran v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1996-05-01· cited 160×
- Fish v. Tandy Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1997-08-14· cited 160×
- World Help v. Leisure Lifestyles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-24· cited 144×
- Bell v. MooresCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-11· cited 136×
- Frost National Bank v. BurgeTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-11-09· cited 133×
- Chapman Children's Trust v. Porter & Hedges, L.L.P.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-11-02· cited 132×
- Marchal v. WebbTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-05-13· cited 126×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court· 1979-10-03· cited 5,187×
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court· 1970-02-11· cited 1,504×
- Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court· 1950-02-01· cited 511×
- Carle v. CarleTexas Supreme Court· 1950-11-29· cited 337×
- Texas Bank and Trust Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 243×
- Crouch v. Panama Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1940-03-27· cited 124×
- McMurray v. McMurrayTexas Supreme Court· 1887-04-19· cited 95×
- Hudnall v. Tyler Bank and Trust CompanyTexas Supreme Court· 1970-07-15· cited 84×
- Cowden v. BellTexas Supreme Court· 1957-03-20· cited 80×
- Garcia v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1948-01-07· cited 43×
- Raney v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-11· cited 28×
- Montgomery v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-16· cited 3×
Other cases named Montgomery v. Kennedy
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.