Skip to main content
· 10/6/1994

Herschbach v. City of Corpus Christi

Citations

  • 883 S.W.2d 720
  • 1994 WL 459225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, “[w]hen a person accepting benefits does not have knowledge of all material facts, ratification or estoppel cannot ensue from acceptance of the benefits”
  • Rule 11 not satisfied where counsel’s remarks were “uncertain and did not state the terms of any stipulation”
  • \An exception to the general rule of governmental immunity is that a municipality is not immune from its proprietary functions.\
  • “An exception to the general rule of governmental immunity is that a municipality is not immune from its proprietary functions.”
  • court must first determine proprietary or governmental function since TTCA does not apply to proprietary
  • court must first determine proprietary or governmental function since TTCA does not apply to proprietary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dorsey, Gilberto Hinojosa, and Federico G. Hinojosa, Jr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.