Kahlig v. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding judgment notwithstanding the verdict was proper on claim for fraud against attorney because acts and omissions about which plaintiff complained fell within ambit of claim for legal malpractice- — a legal theory abandoned at trial
• claims for fraud and DTPA based on attorney’s affair with client’s wife were “disguised malpractice claims” because real complaint was that attorney did not represent client to best of his ability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).