Skip to main content
· 5/30/1991

Anderson v. Snider

Citations

  • 808 S.W.2d 54
  • 1991 WL 50620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conclusory statements made by an expert witness is insufficient summary judgment evidence
  • holding that conclusory statements made by an expert witness is insufficient summary judgment evidence
  • holding that legal conclusions not supported by facts will not support summary judgment
  • holding that legal conclusions not supported by facts will not support summary judgment
  • holding affidavit containing legal conclusions was insufficient to support traditional summary judgment in favor of defendant
  • stating that A [l]ay testimony is insufficient to refute an expert = s testimony @ in summary judgment proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.