· 5/30/1991
Anderson v. Snider
Citations
- 808 S.W.2d 54
- 1991 WL 50620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that conclusory statements made by an expert witness is insufficient summary judgment evidence
- holding that conclusory statements made by an expert witness is insufficient summary judgment evidence
- holding that legal conclusions not supported by facts will not support summary judgment
- holding that legal conclusions not supported by facts will not support summary judgment
- holding affidavit containing legal conclusions was insufficient to support traditional summary judgment in favor of defendant
- stating that A [l]ay testimony is insufficient to refute an expert = s testimony @ in summary judgment proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.