Burkstrand v. Burkstrand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court’s failure to hold hearing within statutory' timé frame did not divest it of subject .matter jurisdiction over petition seeking order for protection
• explaining that when statutory language is silent, courts consider other factors to interpret its meaning, including the statute’s purpose
• rejecting an interpretation of statutory language that would “thwart its very purpose”
• issue of whether trial court’s failure to comply with statutory time frame for holding hearing deprived it of subject matter jurisdiction reviewed as issue “capable of repetition, yet evading judicial review”
• whether statutory time frame in domestic violence statute is subject matter jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-04-23· cited 163×
• Gassler v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-02· cited 97×
• Cox v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2012-07-12· cited 94×
• Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-04-01· cited 75×
• Putman v. Kennedy
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-07-18· cited 73×
• Rohmiller v. Hart
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-02-29· cited 70×
• Marriage of Antone v. Antone
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 55×
• Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. Bergstrom
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-04-30· cited 52×
• In Re the Welfare of J.B.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-05-14· cited 48×
• Kolton v. County of Anoka
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 42×
• State v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-05-09· cited 41×
• State v. Grossman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-12-13· cited 39×
• Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown Surgery Center, and Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, Intervenors.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-02-17· cited 36×
• Reiter v. Kiffmeyer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-28· cited 35×
• Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-01-03· cited 32×
• Beardsley v. Garcia
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-31· cited 30×
• Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 25×
• Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-31· cited 25×
• Wenigar v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-04-04· cited 23×
• GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-04-24· cited 22×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-06-21· cited 346×
• Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-06· cited 201×
• Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-05-09· cited 179×
• State Ex Rel. Doe v. Madonna
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-30· cited 40×
• Kite v. Kite
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 28×
• Baker v. Baker
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-31· cited 27×
• Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of Minneapolis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-06-01· cited 21×
• State v. Errington
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-06· cited 13×
• El Nashaar v. El Nashaar
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-07· cited 6×