Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a statute is ambiguous when it can be given more than one reasonable interpretation
• stating that “[a] statute is ambiguous when it can be given more than one reasonable interpretation”
• stating that if a statute is clear and unambiguous, court may not attempt to construe or interpret it, but must “give effect to the statute’s plain meaning”
• “A statute is ambiguous when it can be given more than one reasonable interpretation.”
• “A statute is ambiguous when it can be given more than one reasonable interpretation.”
• “A statute is ambiguous when it can be given more than one reasonable interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).