Skip to main content

State v. Campbell

Citations

  • 814 N.W.2d 1
  • 2012 WL 1605466
  • 2012 Minn. LEXIS 182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Guidelines phrase \another offense\ had two reasonable interpretations without consulting dictionary definitions of \another\ or \offense\
  • concluding that a Guidelines provision was ambiguous based on two reasonable interpretations of the phrase at issue
  • explaining that when the language of a Sentencing Guidelines provision is plain and unambiguous, it is presumed to manifest the Legislature’s intent, and we must give it effect
  • endorsing consideration of \commission policy and official commission interpretation\ when interpreting an ambiguous provision of the sentencing guidelines
  • \Our interpretation of Minn. Sent. Guidelines 2.F.2. is guided by the context of that section and the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines as a whole.\
  • \We apply the rules of statutory construction to our interpretation of [Minnesota's] sentencing guidelines.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Meyer, Paul, Stras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.