Burks v. Raemisch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that grievance processor was not deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's medical needs when she rejected his grievance as untimely
• holding that officials are “entitled to relegate to the prison’s medical staff the provision of good medical care.”
• holding that a complaint examiner who “carried out her job exactly as she was supposed to” did not violate the Constitution
• holding that wardens and grievance officers are “entitled to relegate to the prison’s medical staff the provision of good medical care.”
• holding that “liability depends on each defendant’s knowledge and actions, not on the knowledge or actions of persons they supervise”
• holding that grievance examiner’s rejection of complaint as untimely without investigation was not deliberate indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).