Seventh Circuit· 2/10/2009
Burks v. Raemisch
Citations
- 555 F.3d 592
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2640
- 2009 WL 305004
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that grievance processor was not deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's medical needs when she rejected his grievance as untimely
- holding that officials are “entitled to relegate to the prison’s medical staff the provision of good medical care.”
- holding that a complaint examiner who “carried out her job exactly as she was supposed to” did not violate the Constitution
- holding that wardens and grievance officers are “entitled to relegate to the prison’s medical staff the provision of good medical care.”
- holding that “liability depends on each defendant’s knowledge and actions, not on the knowledge or actions of persons they supervise”
- holding that grievance examiner’s rejection of complaint as untimely without investigation was not deliberate indifference
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Evans, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arnett v. WebsterSeventh Circuit· 2011-09-12· cited 2,079×
- McGowan v. HulickSeventh Circuit· 2010-07-20· cited 524×
- Livell Figgs v. Alex DawsonSeventh Circuit· 2016-07-25· cited 173×
- Estate of William A. Miller v. Helen MarberrySeventh Circuit· 2017-01-30· cited 141×
- Daniel Aguilar v. Janella Gaston-CamaraSeventh Circuit· 2017-06-28· cited 128×
- Haywood v. HathawaySeventh Circuit· 2016-11-29· cited 116×
- Sidney Peterson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2021-01-26· cited 106×
- Catlin v. City of WheatonSeventh Circuit· 2009-07-21· cited 77×
- Benjamin Adams v. Christina ReagleSeventh Circuit· 2024-01-30· cited 58×
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationN.D. Illinois· 2016-01-07· cited 56×
- Gevas v. MitchellSeventh Circuit· 2012-08-20· cited 56×
- Courtney v. DeVoreSeventh Circuit· 2014-12-12· cited 37×
- Wright v. MillerSeventh Circuit· 2014-04-14· cited 36×
- DeGeer v. GillisN.D. Illinois· 2010-04-21· cited 27×
- Riley v. VilsackW.D. Wisconsin· 2009-10-21· cited 26×
- Boothe ex rel. K.C. v. ShermanN.D. Illinois· 2014-09-03· cited 26×
- Robles v. City of Chi.E.D. Illinois· 2019-01-18· cited 25×
- McCree v. SherrodSeventh Circuit· 2011-02-10· cited 25×
- Conley v. AnglinSeventh Circuit· 2013-03-25· cited 23×
- Turner v. CoxSeventh Circuit· 2014-07-28· cited 17×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,564×
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 2,529×
- Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.AThird Circuit· 2004-06-18· cited 2,084×
- Donald F. Greeno v. George DaleySeventh Circuit· 2005-07-01· cited 1,881×
- Cleavinger v. SaxnerSupreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 1,070×
- Jackie Vance v. Howard Peters, Iii, Director, Jane E. Higgins, Warden, and James Roy, Correctional OfficerSeventh Circuit· 1996-12-18· cited 939×
- Van Dyke Johnson v. Stephen Doughty, Doctor, John Cearlock, Don HinderliterSeventh Circuit· 2006-01-17· cited 821×
- Joel E. Durmer v. Dr. J. O'carroll, M.D. Robert C. Barker William Fauver, Joel DurmerThird Circuit· 1993-03-30· cited 787×
- Hayes v. SnyderSeventh Circuit· 2008-10-09· cited 701×
- Hernandez v. KeaneSecond Circuit· 2003-08-20· cited 223×
- Richman v. SheahanSeventh Circuit· 2008-01-07· cited 58×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.