Taylor v. Sturgell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the preclusive effect of a federal-court judgment is determined by federal common law
• holding that the preclusive effect of a federal-court judgment is determined by federal common law
• holding that the preclusive effect of a federal-court judgment is determined by federal common law
• recognizing that “[r]epresentative suits with preclusive effect on nonparties include properly conducted class actions,” but refusing to extend nonparty preclusion
• holding that substantive legal relationships such as “assignee and assignor” may justify nonparty preclusion
• concluding that the party asserting preclusion carries the burden of establishing all necessary elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).