Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.A

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “mere disagreement as to the proper medical treatment” is insufficient to state a constitutional violation
• holding that “mere disagreement as to the proper medical treatment” is insufficient to state a constitutional violation
• holding that “mere disagreement as to the proper medical treatment’ is insufficient to state a constitutional violation
• holding that “absent a reason to believe (or actual knowledge) that prison doctors or their assistants are mistreating (or not treating
• holding that “absent a reason to believe (or actual knowledge) that prison doctors or their assistants are mistreating (or not treating
• holding that “mere disagreement as to the proper medical treatment” is insufficient to establish an Eighth Amendment violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).