Donald F. Greeno v. George Daley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s “obdurate refusal” to alter course of treatment despite obvious ineffectiveness raised infer ence of deliberate indifference
• recognizing that treatment later received may be considered in determining whether medical professional continued ineffective treatment plan
• concluding that prison complaint examiner's decision not to take further action once he had verified prisoner's treatment with medical officials did not constitute deliberate indifference
• holding that referring the matter to medical providers that can provide treatment is not considered deliberate indifference
• holding that defendant’s “obdurate refusal” to alter course of treatment despite obvious ineffectiveness raised inference of deliberate indifference
• holding that continuing to treat severe vomiting with antacids and refusing to refer inmate to a specialist over three years created material fact issue of deliberate indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).