Conley v. Anglin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a plaintiff’s “claim for breach of the implied covenant was properly dismissed” when found to be duplicative of its breach of contract claim
• holding that “because the facts underlying both [breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant] claims are identical and the [plaintiff] seeks identical remedies, the claim for breach of the implied covenant was properly dismissed as duplicative”
• holding that “because the facts underlying both [breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant] claims are identical and the [plaintiff] seeks identical remedies, the claim for breach of the implied covenant was properly dismissed as duplicative”
• explaining claims for breach of contract and breach of implied covenant “are duplicative when both arise from the same facts and seek the identical damages for each alleged breach” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• reviewing application of statute of limitations at motion to dismiss stage de novo
• dismissing claim for breach of implied covenant as duplicative of breach-of-contract claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).