Skip to main content
· 10/9/2008

Hayes v. Snyder

Citations

  • 546 F.3d 516
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21097
  • 2008 WL 4511881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendants were not deliberately indifferent because they “investigated [the plaintiff’s] complaints and referred them to the responsible medical providers”
  • stating that the plaintiff “does not need to prove that his complaints of severe pain were ‘literally ignored’ ”
  • noting that a prison official might not have been entitled to summary judgment if he “had ignored [the prisoner’s] complaints entirely”
  • reversing summary judgment in favor of the defendant where he continued to monitor the inmate’s treatment after the initial in-person examinations
  • noting that the existence of an injury “that significantly affects an individual’s daily activities” or that causes “chronic and substantial pain” indicates that a prisoner has a serious medical need
  • finding that officials who quickly contacted medical professionals, and did not have obvious reason to believe their responses were inadequate, did enough to investigate an inmate’s grievance of a serious medical situation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.