District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/23/1997
Shapiro v. State
Citations
- 696 So. 2d 1321
- 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8402
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that there was no reasonable expectation of privacy for a psychologist's therapeutic deceptions to convince a current patient to engage in prohibitive sexual conduct with him
- finding no abuse of discretion in lower court’s admission of prior-act testimony involving another individual from twenty years earlier
- \Similar fact evidence of collateral crimes may be admitted as relevant even if it is not uniquely similar.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shahood, Stone, Warner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Derouen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 73×
- Gore v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 71×
- Brazill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-14· cited 16×
- Lambert v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-12-10· cited 13×
- Hobby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-12· cited 11×
- Foburg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 11×
- Tate v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-10· cited 10×
- State v. RichmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-10· cited 9×
- Bynes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-24· cited 8×
- Bruce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-01· cited 4×
- In re WattsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1999-09-24· cited 3×
- Caddy v. State, Dept. of HealthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17· cited 2×
- University Books & Videos, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade CountyS.D. Florida· 1999-08-27· cited 2×
- State v. MontasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-31· cited 2×
- Woodie C. Lambert v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-09-13
- Shannon Troy Derouen v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-05-02
- John T. Gore v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2009-07-01
- Shapiro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-23
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-06
- State ex rel. Lemoine v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2015-11-20
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 2,030×
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,457×
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 1,290×
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court· 1989-06-29· cited 1,218×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
- Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court· 1986-09-11· cited 953×
- Stanley Haves, Marjorie Haves, His Wife v. City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of FloridaEleventh Circuit· 1995-05-19· cited 402×
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
- Shevin v. Byron, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-01-17· cited 162×
- Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel WageringSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-10· cited 147×
- In re T.W.Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-10-05· cited 142×
- McCabe v. SharrettEleventh Circuit· 1994-02-07· cited 135×
- Schmitt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 132×
- Finney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 122×
- Carter v. SparkmanSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-05-05· cited 99×
- Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 98×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-05-26· cited 77×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.