Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 560 A.2d 605
  • 80 Md. App. 187
  • 1989 Md. App. LEXIS 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering, as a condition of probation, that the defendant pass a polygraph test and repeat her story in court
  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering, as a condition of probation, that the defendant pass a polygraph test and repeat her story in court
  • holding that although evidence of threats to a witness may be offered for the limited purpose of explaining the witness’ prior inconsistent statements in an effort to rehabilitate the witness
  • stating that Rule 1-501 “eliminates the common law ‘voucher’ rule and obviates the need for court’s witnesses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alpert, Bell, Fischer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.