Skip to main content

Stone v. State

Citations

  • 405 A.2d 345
  • 43 Md. App. 329
  • 6 A.L.R. 4th 439
  • 1979 Md. App. LEXIS 384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in the absence of express statutory authority, confinement in a jail-type institution is not an authorized condition of probation
  • holding that in the absence of express statutory authority, confinement in a jail-type institution is not an authorized condition of probation
  • suggesting that validity of conditions of probation may be heard in post conviction procedure
  • for review of condition of probation, appellant may invoke Rule 4-345 or post conviction procedures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Mason and Liss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.