Pearlstein v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was no error when, instead of giving instructions in the form requested by appellant, trial court read verbatim from the language of the statute
• holding there was no error when, instead of giving instructions in the form requested by appellant, trial court read verbatim from the language of the statute (discussing Cardin v. State, 73 Md. App. 200, 219 (1987))
• finding no need to \recapitulate . . . the massive [trial] evidence presented\
• unnecessary to recapitulate all evidence presented at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).