White v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• intent necessary to prove theft and fraudulent misappropriation need not be proven directly but “may be shown by [the] surrounding circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2004-11-12· cited 14×
• Breakfield v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-04· cited 7×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-07-19· cited 225×
• MacK v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-23· cited 168×
• Shell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-24· cited 125×
• Logan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-11· cited 117×
• Simmons v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-06-28· cited 107×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-09-16· cited 105×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-08· cited 104×
• State v. Gover
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-09· cited 67×
• Ali v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-07· cited 56×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-28· cited 41×
• Ward v. Board of Examiners of Engineers, Architects & Surveyors
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 24×
• Crawford v. Leahy
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-09· cited 23×
• Lomax v. Comptroller of the Treasury
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-07-08· cited 21×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-07-07· cited 19×
• State v. Burroughs
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-02-09· cited 14×
• Stathes v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-12-30· cited 6×
• Mattingly v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-04· cited 5×