Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 7/1/1998

Anderton v. Anderton

Citations

  • 988 S.W.2d 675
  • 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 431
  • 1998 WL 1039861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that consideration of spousal support should follow decisions related to how the parties‟ property is divided
  • “The statutory preference for rehabilitative support does not entirely displace other forms of spousal support when the facts warrant long term or more open-ended support.”
  • “The statutory preference for rehabilitative support does not entirely displace other forms of spousal support when the facts warrant long term or more open-ended support.”
  • “The statutory -9- preference for rehabilitative support does not entirely displace other forms of spousal support when the facts warrant long term or more open-ended support.”
  • no Tenn.R.App.P. 11 application filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Todd, Middle, Cantrell, Koch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

188 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Anderton v. Anderton

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.