Mitts v. Mitts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counting as income for child support purposes distributions made to minority shareholder from corporate earnings
• increase in value of husband’s stock resulted from sale of land for development, and “neither party by his or her efforts, directly or indirectly, contributed to the increase in value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).