Court of Appeals of Virginia· 8/31/1999

Brown v. Brown

Citations

518 S.E.2d 336
30 Va. App. 532
1999 Va. App. LEXIS 511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

the finder of fact is given broad discretion in determining what promotes the children’s best interests
“In deciding whether to modify a custody order, the trial court’s paramount concern must be the children’s best interests.”
“In deciding whether to modify a custody order, the trial court’s paramount concern must be the children’s best interests.”
“As long as evidence in the record supports the trial court’s ruling and the trial court has not abused its discretion, its ruling must be affirmed on appeal.”
“As long as evidence in the record supports the trial court’s ruling and the trial court has not abused its discretion, its ruling must be affirmed on appeal.”
“[T]he trial court has broad discretion in determining what promotes the children’s best interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Elder, Bumgardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.