Indiana Court of Appeals· 11/23/1993

Brim v. State

Citations

624 N.E.2d 27
1993 Ind. App. LEXIS 1419
1993 WL 478834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that where two witnesses had testified at trial that the defendant had previously beaten the same victim on previous occasions, the prior beatings were admissible to prove defendant's identity
observing that where two witnesses had testified at trial that the defendant had previously beaten the same victim on previous occasions, the prior beatings were admissible to prove defendant's identity
victim’s prior statement to police identifying Brim was admissible to rebut accusation that the identification was not the result of her own independent knowledge, but instead was the product of suggestions made by her mother and others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Baker, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.