Skip to main content
· 6/10/1988

United States v. Ernest Gail Lail

Citations

  • 846 F.2d 1299
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7920
  • 1988 WL 51285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court abused its discretion because the similarities between the charged conduct and the 404(b) evidence did not provide a “signature” and there were major dissimilarities between the charged robberies and the 404(b) robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vance, Anderson, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.