Day v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant placed his intent at issue through defense counsel’s cross-examination of the two victims which “suggested the lack of [defendant’s] intent as they emphasized the innocent nature of the touches being made during a game of tag”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lipka
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-11-01· cited 51×
• Greenboam v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-30· cited 26×
• Humbert v. Smith
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-02-14· cited 11×
• Smith v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-11-29· cited 6×
• Ely v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-09-22· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lannan v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-10-16· cited 204×
• Wickizer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 136×
• Owen v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-11-08· cited 51×
• Butcher v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-27· cited 28×
• Brim v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-11-23· cited 22×
• Vaughn v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-04-14· cited 20×
• Levi v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-31· cited 15×
• Wilson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-04-17· cited 8×
• Bradberry v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1975-06-04· cited 4×