Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 508 N.E.2d 1264
  • 1987 Ind. LEXIS 959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “while each error of counsel individually may not be sufficient to prove ineffective representation, an accumulation of such failures may amount to ineffective assistance”
  • counsel’s complete lack of trial preparation and failure to present any evidence to support alibi defense merited reversal for new trial
  • “[W]hile each error of counsel individually may not be sufficient to prove ineffective representation, an accumulation of such failures may amount to ineffective assistance.”
  • “It is the compilation of errors and omissions by counsel which creates the necessity for reversal in this case.”
  • “counsel’s failure to present exculpatory evidence may not constitute ineffective assistance where that evidence is introduced to the jury through other witnesses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Debruler, Givan, Dickson, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.