Indiana Supreme Court· 6/16/1987
Williams v. State
Citations
- 508 N.E.2d 1264
- 1987 Ind. LEXIS 959
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “while each error of counsel individually may not be sufficient to prove ineffective representation, an accumulation of such failures may amount to ineffective assistance”
- counsel’s complete lack of trial preparation and failure to present any evidence to support alibi defense merited reversal for new trial
- “[W]hile each error of counsel individually may not be sufficient to prove ineffective representation, an accumulation of such failures may amount to ineffective assistance.”
- “It is the compilation of errors and omissions by counsel which creates the necessity for reversal in this case.”
- “counsel’s failure to present exculpatory evidence may not constitute ineffective assistance where that evidence is introduced to the jury through other witnesses”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Debruler, Givan, Dickson, Pivarnik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-08-31· cited 251×
- French v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-11-22· cited 246×
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-05-24· cited 140×
- Roche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-30· cited 125×
- Conner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-05-25· cited 123×
- Canaan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 120×
- Schiro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-02-08· cited 84×
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 76×
- Douglas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-04-24· cited 68×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-03-07· cited 66×
- Coleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-04-24· cited 66×
- Ian McCullough v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-08-27· cited 57×
- Burris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-08-24· cited 54×
- Hunter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-09-20· cited 53×
- Pennycuff v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-04-18· cited 41×
- Fisher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 35×
- Propes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-03-08· cited 35×
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-05-06· cited 33×
- Shaffer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-11-27· cited 33×
- Berry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-10-31· cited 32×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Countee Williams v. John J. Twomey, WardenSeventh Circuit· 1975-03-24· cited 221×
- Magley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-10-21· cited 140×
- Terry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-09· cited 138×
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 96×
- Lowe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-11-23· cited 75×
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1969-01-08· cited 71×
- Crisp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-09-11· cited 59×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-11-28· cited 58×
- Mato v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 45×
- Foster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1974-12-20· cited 32×
- Sotelo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-08-21· cited 29×
- Sweet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1954-03-04· cited 28×
- Roberts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1981-04-27· cited 26×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-04-16· cited 18×
- Bennett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-11-30· cited 12×
- Battles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-12-26· cited 6×
- Shull v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1981-03-17· cited 4×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.