Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/10/1980
Briggs v. State
Citations
- 421 A.2d 1369
- 289 Md. 23
- 1980 Md. LEXIS 235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that when this Court interpreted the trial de novo rule, we noted that the Revisor’s Notes denote legislative intent
- analyzing Cts. & Jud. Proc. §§ 12-702(b) & (c) and explaining that an examination of Pearce is useful to resolving the issues since the statute was created in response to Pearce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Digges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-11· cited 117×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-24· cited 76×
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-05-14· cited 59×
- Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-23· cited 58×
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-01-12· cited 52×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-09-01· cited 49×
- Marsheck v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-12· cited 39×
- Rohrbaugh v. Estate of SternCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-02-28· cited 37×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-07-02· cited 35×
- Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-08-26· cited 32×
- BD. OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. SpitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-20· cited 26×
- State v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-06-12· cited 22×
- State v. EnriquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-24· cited 18×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-09-30· cited 16×
- Stanton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-04· cited 14×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-30· cited 13×
- Bacon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-02-26· cited 12×
- Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-03· cited 11×
- Ball v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-11· cited 8×
- Reisch v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-28· cited 8×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,863×
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court· 1971-12-14· cited 1,338×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 708×
- State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-12-03· cited 179×
- Harbor Island Marina v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-11-07· cited 111×
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-07-13· cited 103×
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-11-25· cited 81×
- Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-30· cited 69×
- United States v. Simeon Jessamy CokeSecond Circuit· 1968-11-27· cited 66×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-03-10· cited 62×
- Mann v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-06-15· cited 51×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-07-20· cited 39×
- State v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1890-07-01· cited 38×
- Thurman E. Wood v. Maj. Fred Ross, Supt. Of Caledonia Prison Farm, Wayne Claude Rice v. State of North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1970-11-16· cited 34×
- Hobbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-06· cited 33×
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-28· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.